Bourgeois and Proletarians free essay sample

Some societies, like the bourgeois has not ended societal oppression and has instead recreated new class structures, which created not a solution but new societal issues and oppression that masked the old struggle. The bourgeois in particular has simplified active hostility among the classes, however society has branched off into two divided and very much opposing groups, being the bourgeois and the proletariat. The bourgeois steamed from aspects of the burghers that came the serfs in the Middle Ages. From the early middle age towns beginning with the serfs were the foundations in which the bourgeois were created. With the discoveries of America, colonization and European expansion the Bourgeois had much opportunity to be a rising class and take advantage of all that the discovery of America had to offer. With new discoveries and trade with other countries gave immense development to feudal societies. The markets of the feudal system were not longer able to meet the needs of the growing economy and so a new market system arose; guild masters were set aside by the manufacturing middle class. This growing market made the separation not within corporate guilds but rather among labor in workshops. As the markets exponentially expanded, they were no longer able to keep up with the growing demands, and with industrial steam and mechanical productions the manufacture were replaced by the industrial middle class who were the industry leaders, that which were the bourgeois. It was the discovery of America that brought on the rapid growth of markets, just like the ever-expanding markets, commerce and railways so did the bourgeois, by expanding their capital as well as establishing themselves in classes. Through this it can be seen that the modern bourgeois has been a long developing class through commerce and expansion as well as industrialism and commodities. Throughout the bourgeois development were political class advances that were tied along with it. Societies comprised of the â€Å"lower† and oppressed class were under rule of self governing nobility, places like Italy and Germany were independent urban states where as the â€Å"third estate† was a self ruling monarchy such as in France. After serving absolute monarchies or semi-feudalism and the prosper of the world markets made a name for itself in political abilities and in a representative state. The bourgeois played a very influential part in societal revolution, one that can be argued to be the most important part. It was usually the bourgeois that have had their way and has vanquished many other societal relationships such as idyllic, feudal and patriarchal. It established many societal changes, changes that more so revolved around value and worth. The bourgeois powers were masked by religious and political virtues and law, however and more importantly they set up free trade, were known for exploitation and other ungodly matters. The once so honorable occupations such as doctors, lawyers, priest and poet were belittled to mere everyday paid wageworkers. To the bourgeois family was seen as a money transaction, their families were used to be made a profit of and sough out in any way to be used to grow their income. People admire the bourgeois for the strength throughout the middle ages and that it shows what mans wonders can accomplish, which can be said to more than that of the famous Egyptian pyramids, Gothic cathedrals and Roman aqueducts; as for the greatest expeditions of all time such as the crusades and those of any other famous mass departures of people. The way the bourgeoisie were so dominant and strong was due to there alterations of what ever was necessary as they saw fit; changing relations of society as needed and changing production as needed. What made the bourgeoisies different from classes, especially the earlier industrial classes, was the need for constant revolutionary changes in production, keeping social conditions undisturbed, and ambiguity. Ancient outlooks and opinions and values become outdated, so that man now faces real life and societal conditions The markets expand ever so vastly so that the bourgeoisie also expand throughout globe, to settle and establish themselves. The bourgeoisie establish a feel of comfort and easy with its production and consumption throughout the globe, where ever they are settled across the globe. Reactionist say that it has came from underneath great modes of production to a larger than ever expansion of industry and consumption. Old national industries are being taken over by new industries where they are no longer mining raw materials in their own back yard but throughout various places across the globe. Old wants as well as old national and local find new wants and alter production to suit their needs; independence of sister nations are now possible. Just as commercial production become more and more prominent so does intellectual productions, from this the combination of world and local intellectual creates an overall world literature. By the bourgeoisies immense rapid modes of production of all kinds it brings about the most barbaric nations to join them in civilization, along with luring all nations, even those nations close to extensions, to take part in their means of production. They made the world adopt their customs making the bourgeois, and their nations into bourgeois nations. The cities that the bourgeoisie created were by far large, and the population within those cities grew much more than that of the rural areas. This made barbarian towns dependent on the civilized bourgeoisies, just as similarly the country was dependent on the towns. There was much to do with the size of let population, as there was a mass of population centralized to the means of production; property was taken care of by few, this would mean that politics were going to be centralized. Provinces that were independent of one another became nation, with the same under one law, government, same national interest, tariffs, and customs. The hundred year reign of the bourgeois produced more and gained the most productive strength than that of another previous generation before them. It was through the means of production and exchange that the bourgeois in a feudal society made a name for it and began to expand. However, the feudal relations of property were no longer able to keep up with such quick development that they were restrained from developing and making a profit in many industries. Social and political constitution was adapted to feudal society by the economical and political influence of the bourgeois class. Movements such as that in which the bourgeoisie had developed are present today, with relations of production, exchange, property and society. Today there is a revolt against modern productive forces and bourgeoisie modern conditions of production, which is a threat to the bourgeoisie rule. There is a threat of having past creative productive forces abolished from time to time, until one day it would be gone forever, and a crisis that this will cause over-production, and too much of everything, that which in past history would seem quite ironic. Because of the bourgeoisie power and their accomplishments as they try to remedy the crisis they simply bring more kayos to their society and prevent themselves in thriving and keeping their property. The bourgeoisie have a few ways to get over the crisis; by enforcing destruction of mass productive forces or by conquest of new markets. That is to say that the destructive forces in which the bourgeoisie overcame feudalism are now being used against them. However, not only do the weapons once used by the bourgeoisie hurt itself but it also endangers the working class- the proletarians. Just as the bourgeois developed so did the proletarians- the working class, and so they will continue to live and thrive as long as there is work and as song long labor increases they will be able to find work. As the market fluctuates so does the working class, and so they are similar to commodities. Due to machinery and the division of labour the working class are seen to have on charm as their jobs do not have a glamorous side, as they are simply men who work the machines. As the work increased the wages are decreased Modern industries converted small workshops of patriarchal masters into great large industrial capitalist factories. The large masses of workers are similar to that of soldiers and organized as such that it is in the army and are placed under the command of their commanding officers. Similarly once again it is as if the working class are enslaved by the bourgeoisies class, bourgeois state and the machinery in which they use to work. Age and sex (male or female) are of little importance as the both provide labor, although men put forth more labor women are still able to provide labor. After workers are paid their wages and made to be felt inferior the go out into society and are also exploited by people such as their landlords and shop keepers. The lower part of the middle class, comprising of; small trades people, shop keepers, retired trades people, handicraftsmen and peasants gradually fall into the proletarian category because they do not have the wealth as the larger corporations and because their skills are considered to be not needed and useless in the world. As soon as the proletarians arose and began in history it was at constant struggle with the bourgeoisie. It began individually and expanded to the working laborers and to began to attack against the bourgeoisie who exploited them. However they did not attack the bourgeoisie themselves but against what belonged to them; their equipment and machinery, by setting factories on fire and/or smashing their machines. Workers yet did not have a union and rather grouped themselves among their nation and at a secret war with one another, they were under the stronghold and union of the bourgeoisie instead. They oddly did not fight their enemies but instead they fought their enemies’ opposition. This whole movement and every victory during this time period was a victory for the bourgeoisie. As the industry developed so did the proletarians, they grew in number and they grew in strength as the proletarians start to become more equal. The new sense of equality among the proletarians are due to the low wages given to all workers despite the level of labor, there were no ranks and no distinction of labor. Proletarians begin to form working associations with one another and unions as the bourgeoisie gave working fluctuating wages, they rallied together for high and non fluctuating wages. At times the contest between the proletarians would end up in revolts. At times the workers got what they wanted but it was not always victorious for them. Their main challenge was to expand their union, what made this helpful was the modern industry creating a better means of communication in which workers from far regions would be able to communicate with one another. This mean of communication now allowed workers from other nations to join together to somewhat of a unified group to address the struggle between the classes. From being divided into a class of their own the proletarians became a political party, yet there among competition with one another to and again, however after their fall as competitors they rise again more stronger that the previously were. Through legislation of workers the ten-hour bill in England was then carried. The bourgeoisie are at first in struggle with the aristocracy and then with other bourgeoisie who have come to have antagonistic interest to the process of the industry and for this they are in a turmoil majority of the time. As the bourgeoisie have their own struggles, the struggles of other classes help the proletarians fundamentally develop. For sometimes the bourgeoisie asked the proletarians for help in that in return they would give the proletarians ammunition to use against the bourgeoisie. This shows that the bourgeoisie themselves, being the ruling class, somewhat appealed to the proletarians and/or also are seen to have a possibility to feel helpless towards them at times. They seem to have had an effect on the proletarians by showing them of their will and power the proletarians developed a sense of enlightenment and progress. There begins a movement of disorganization and disbanding of the ruling class in which old society begins violent character where that ruling classes moved to revolutionary class, just as the nobility had moved to the bourgeoisie; and now a ration of the bourgeoisie move to the proletariats and lastly a portion of the bourgeoisie ideologist. Compared to any class the proletarians are a revolutionary class, compared to any other class who eventually become extinct in the face of modern industry. The lower middle class are in constant struggle and fight the bourgeoisie to prevent themselves from disappearing, such as artisans, shopkeepers and peasants; they are conservative rather that revolutionary. If they are revolutionary and have future interest rather than present-day interest they will become proletariats. Old society is old and rotten, just wasting there and may get swept up in the proletarian movement. The proletariat of old society have no national character, as it has been taken by modern industrial labor and modern subjection to capital. In the past classes who had the upper hand tried to fix society to tend to their means and appropriation, yet the proletarians had no upper hand to begin with and no property or capital at that. Their means were instead destroying their enemies’ property Movements throughout history have been that of minorities or have had minorities interest included in those movements. The proletarian movement is one of a mass group of people from different nation who share the same class struggles of being the lowest societal class that struggles to make it better for themselves. The struggle between the bourgeoisie and the proletarians is one of a first national struggle, but before the proletarians from other nations can come together they must first settle the struggle within their own nations bourgeoisie and then create a union among themselves. The development of the proletarians can be traced back to civil wars where upset societies create such an uproar that a revolution breaks out in which the bourgeoisie are taken over which builds a foundation for the proletarians. Up to present day society has been class and oppression based, however class oppression must have certain boundaries before the class disappears, and upon a class being oppressed the existence must be maintainable and able to thrive. You see a serf in his time rise to the occasion and take on commune memberships and make a name for himself where as the modern laborer sink deeper and deeper into non existence in his own class until her becomes a pauper, and with this the bourgeoisie are not considered fit to rule because there is no promise an existence of the laborer within labor. And so the condition for existence of the bourgeoisie is capital and the condition to have capital is the need for paid labor. The development of modern industry therefore fails the bourgeoisie as what was once the bourgeoisie foundation is taken from them and so the proletarians are victorious. Bourgeois and Proletarians, Summary We see the history of the bourgeoisie as well as the history of the proletarians and importantly the relationship between the proletarians and the bourgeoisie and how both classes grew to both become revolutionary, more so one than the other, the proletarians. The Communist Manifesto attempts to explain the sparks of historical revolutions, in particular the bourgeoisie and the proletarians and that the means of production and industrial advancement creates class struggles as one class, the more powerful class, in this case the bourgeoisie, exploits the working class. The modern industrial society is taken aback by the conflict between the bourgeoisie and the proletarians, particularly due to the exploitation from the bourgeoisie; poor working conditions and low wages. The proletarians take force as they become larger and stronger in number to take on the bourgeoisie, however they have no property so instead they destroy the property of the bourgeoisie by ruining the machinery and putting fire to their factories and leading a revolution. It implies that revolutions creates new classes and argues that advancement in production is unavoidable and will happen throughout the future as it has been in the past. Once strong leaders and upper middle class can be overthrown by never been used tactics such as the proletarians and they use of property destruction.